• Kommentar vom Hochblauen

    Ein moralisches Angebot! Von Evelyn Hecht-Galinski

    Kommentar vom Hochblauen Bild-bdsmovement   Ein moralisches Angebot! Von Evelyn Hecht-Galinski Nachdem sich 50 ehemalige europäische Spitzenpolitiker endlich zur Kritik aufgerafft haben und einen Aufruf gegen Trumps „Nahost-Peace-Plan“ mit zu unterschreiben, fällt auf, das alle [lesen]
  • Kommentar vom Hochblauen

    Das Virus-Komplott Von Evelyn Hecht-Galinski

      Kommentar vom Hochblauen   Das Virus-Komplott Von Evelyn Hecht-Galinski   Seit das Corona-Virus weltweit tausende von Menschen infizierte, ist man zu Recht in Aufruhr. Allerdings sollten wir aufmerksam beobachten, welche dramatischen politischen Folgen daraus [lesen]

Memo to Kerry: Support for one state is growing among Palestinians and Israelis, by Jonathan Ofir

Memo to Kerry: Support for one state is growing among Palestinians and Israelis

In his recent speech ‚Remarks on Middle East Peace‘ which I have already ‚interrupted‘ and appraised the selective historical timeline of, John Kerry had also misrepresented a very central other issue, which I have not yet regarded in detail: The wish amongst Israelis and Palestinians for a one-state solution.

1 Kommentar zu Memo to Kerry: Support for one state is growing among Palestinians and Israelis, by Jonathan Ofir

  1. Something in John Kerry, US Secretary of State in service’s speech troubles me, whe Kerry says „Today, there are a number – there are a similar number of Jews and Palestinians living between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea. They have a choice. They can choose to live together in one state, or they can separate into two states. But here is a fundamental reality: if the choice is one state, Israel can either be Jewish or democratic – it cannot be both – and it won’t ever really be at peace. Moreover, the Palestinians will never fully realize their vast potential in a homeland of their own with a one-state solution“.
    Kerry, by giving priority choice to a „Jewish“ state, instead of a DEMOCRATIC one, tells us his profound dependence from the Zionist idiology. Just think what this means!
    How can it be that Kerry, by opposing „Jewish“ and „democratic“ chooses „Jewish“ and not, what everybody would expect from a defender of a democracy,“democratic“? Segregation, as a value of „american democracy“?

Kommentar hinterlassen

E-Mail Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht.


*


%d Bloggern gefällt das: